For many financial advisors, the decision to go independent or join an RIA aggregator represents one of the most pivotal choices in their career. Both paths promise the potential for greater control, client alignment, and long-term growth—but each carries its own set of operational, regulatory, and strategic considerations. Understanding what each route truly entails can help you align your professional goals with the structure that best supports them.
The landscape of advisor independence has expanded dramatically in recent years. Advisors now have access to more technology, compliance support, and strategic partnerships than ever before, making independence increasingly attainable. Yet the aggregator model also offers appealing advantages—shared infrastructure, turnkey systems, and a faster launch process. Deciding between these two options isn’t about which is “better,” but about which is better suited to your business model, your tolerance for responsibility, and your long-term vision for ownership and autonomy.
Understanding the Two Paths
For advisors evaluating their next move, both independence and joining an aggregator present legitimate, proven models. The right choice often depends on how much autonomy, support, and long-term control you want in your business. Below, we’ll explore each path and what it offers — along with a visual comparison to help you weigh the differences.
What Independence Really Means
Becoming a fully independent RIA means you own every part of your business — from your client relationships to your compliance infrastructure. You control your branding, investment philosophy, pricing, and technology stack. Independence gives you full flexibility to build a firm that reflects your vision and values, and to make decisions with your clients’ best interests at the center.
However, that freedom comes with greater responsibility. Independent advisors must oversee compliance filings, operational processes, and technology management directly. Many partner with consulting firms like SimplyRIA™ to streamline these tasks, ensuring they stay compliant and efficient while maintaining full ownership. Independence rewards those who value control and are ready to take on the operational and regulatory demands that come with it.
What an RIA Aggregator Offers
An RIA aggregator provides advisors with an established structure under a larger registered entity. These firms handle key administrative and compliance functions, often including trading, billing, cybersecurity, and technology integrations. For many advisors, this shared infrastructure reduces startup complexity and allows them to focus more on clients and growth.
In exchange, advisors typically share a portion of their revenue or operate within certain brand and procedural guidelines. While aggregators can accelerate time-to-market and reduce daily operational stress, they may also limit branding flexibility or influence how investment decisions are made. Advisors considering this path should evaluate how comfortable they are aligning with an overarching structure and whether they envision long-term independence down the road.
Comparison at a Glance
| Factor | Full Independence | Affiliated RIA Model |
| Control | Full control over branding, compliance, pricing, and strategy. | Shared control; some firm-wide policies may apply. |
| Compliance | Managed directly or outsourced to a compliance consultant. | Centralized and overseen by the parent RIA. |
| Technology | Freedom to select preferred tech stack and custodians. | Predefined platform with built-in integrations. |
| Startup Cost | Higher initial investment but full ownership and equity. | Lower upfront cost, typically offset by revenue share. |
| Revenue and Equity | 100% ownership of revenue and firm equity. | Partial revenue share, limited or no firm equity. |
| Speed to Market | Longer setup time but fully customizable operations. | Faster launch using established systems and filings. |
| Long-Term Flexibility | Complete autonomy, adaptable for future growth or sale. | Some restrictions when transitioning or rebranding. |
Key Factors to Consider When Choosing
Evaluating whether to operate independently or under an aggregator involves more than comparing payout grids or technology platforms. It’s about understanding how each model aligns with your long-term goals, operational comfort level, and client-service philosophy. The following considerations can help you make a well-informed decision rooted in strategy rather than convenience.
- Control and Decision-Making
- Independence offers complete authority over branding, investment philosophy, and client experience.
- Aggregators may impose standardized processes or shared brand elements that limit flexibility.
- Compliance Oversight
- Independent RIAs must manage filings, testing, and documentation, either in-house or through a compliance partner.
- Aggregators typically provide centralized compliance infrastructure, reducing hands-on responsibility but also limiting customization.
- Technology and Operations
- Independence allows you to build a customized tech stack that supports your workflow and preferred custodian relationships.
- Aggregators provide established systems, which can streamline operations but may not integrate perfectly with your ideal setup.
- Economics and Ownership
- Independent advisors retain full revenue and equity ownership, building firm value over time.
- Aggregator models often include revenue sharing or platform fees in exchange for infrastructure and support.
- Growth and Transition Goals
- Independence may appeal to those seeking to build a lasting, transferable enterprise.
- Aggregators may serve advisors who prefer to simplify administration or eventually transition toward independence later.
Understanding these factors through the lens of your personal goals and capacity for operational responsibility can help clarify which model aligns best with your vision. Each approach offers benefits, but the right fit depends on where you find the balance between autonomy, efficiency, and long-term sustainability.
Exploring the Hybrid Affiliation Model
A middle road between full independence and joining a large aggregator is the hybrid or affiliated RIA model—a structure in which advisors operate under their own DBA while leveraging shared infrastructure, compliance oversight, and administrative support from the parent RIA. In this model, you maintain your brand identity, client ownership, and day-to-day autonomy, but benefit from turnkey compliance frameworks, technology platforms, and regulatory backstop. The hybrid model can allow you to scale faster without bearing the full burden of building every facet of your business from scratch. This structure is especially compelling for advisors who want to preserve flexibility and control while minimizing overhead and regulatory risk.
The hybrid channel has seen strong growth and institutional backing in recent years, as more firms recognize that advisors want access to infrastructure without sacrificing independence. For example, Cerulli Associates reports that independent and hybrid RIA channels have grown from representing 18 % of advisory assets a decade ago to more than 27 % today—with expectations that the combined share could surpass 30 % in the next five years (Cerulli, 2024, “RIA Channel Growth Prompts Asset Managers to Increase Menu of Resources,”). This momentum underscores that many advisors look for a “best of both worlds” model: operational support with brand autonomy.
Questions to Ask Before You Decide
Choosing between full independence and an affiliated RIA model is not only a business decision—it’s a personal one. The right path depends on your long-term vision, appetite for responsibility, and comfort with compliance and operations. Asking yourself the right questions early can clarify which model aligns best with your goals and what kind of support structure you’ll need to sustain success.
- How important is complete autonomy to me?
Consider whether you want total control over branding, operations, and technology—or whether shared infrastructure would add efficiency and peace of mind. - Am I prepared to manage compliance independently?
Independence requires systems for filings, testing, and documentation. If you prefer to focus on clients rather than regulations, an affiliated RIA may be a better fit. - What does long-term success look like for my practice?
Are you building a transferable firm that could one day operate without you, or do you see yourself thriving within a collaborative structure? - How much operational support do I realistically need?
Think about your comfort level with handling billing, trading, cybersecurity, and technology integrations versus outsourcing them to a larger platform. - Do I value brand ownership over convenience?
Some advisors prioritize a fully independent identity; others value the simplicity and time savings of a shared ecosystem.
Taking the time to answer these questions honestly helps you move beyond surface-level comparisons and focus on what truly matters: creating a practice that aligns with your professional purpose and serves your clients effectively.
Building Your Future on the Right Foundation
Whether you choose to build your own RIA or align under an affiliated model, the best decision is the one that supports both your clients and your long-term vision. Independence offers the satisfaction of complete ownership and flexibility, while the affiliated RIA approach provides structure, efficiency, and reduced administrative burden. Both paths can lead to growth and success when chosen intentionally and supported by the right resources.
The key is knowing your priorities—control, compliance, scalability, and client experience—and matching them to the model that empowers you to focus on what you do best: advising clients. At SimplyRIA™, we help advisors navigate these decisions with clarity and confidence. Whether you’re ready to launch your own RIA or explore a supported path through our Advisor Launch Pad, our experienced team can help you chart the right course for your firm’s future.
